Joyce Dijs-Elsinga
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Papers in
-
- Sexual Differentiation and Disorders 1
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
- Co-authors
- H.J. Smeets (4 shared papers)J. Kievit (5 shared papers)Wilma Otten (4 shared papers)Perla J. Marang‐van de Mheen (5 shared papers)Richard A. van Lingen (1 shared paper)Michel H. Hof (1 shared paper)Chantal W.P.M. Hukkelhoven (1 shared paper)Marije Hogeveen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Medical Decision Making (3 papers)BMJ Quality & Safety (1 paper)American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Joyce Dijs-Elsinga
7 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 44
- General Health Professions 73
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 43
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 22
- Economics and Econometrics 33
Countries citing papers authored by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga
This map shows the geographic impact of Joyce Dijs-Elsinga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joyce Dijs-Elsinga more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joyce Dijs-Elsinga. The network helps show where Joyce Dijs-Elsinga may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Joyce Dijs-Elsinga, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 155 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 7 | [Quality of care and operative complications: comparison of the results of 3 medical departments]. | 2011 | 2 |
| 8 | Preconception counselling in general practice | 1999 | 0 |
About Joyce Dijs-Elsinga
Joyce Dijs-Elsinga is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacy, having authored 8 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Influenza Virus Research Studies (1 paper), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper) and Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (44 citations), General Health Professions (73 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (43 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (22 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (33 citations). Joyce Dijs-Elsinga has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include H.J. Smeets, J. Kievit, Wilma Otten, Perla J. Marang‐van de Mheen, Richard A. van Lingen, Michel H. Hof, Chantal W.P.M. Hukkelhoven, Marije Hogeveen, Wendeline J. van der Made and R. Vree. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Decision Making, BMJ Quality & Safety, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.