Joy Hendry

2.2k citations
46 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Joy Hendry

42 papers receiving 763 citations

Peers

Joy Hendry
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Linguistics and Language 155
  • Language and Linguistics 323
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 202
  • Cultural Studies 104
  • Literature and Literary Theory 107
Replace Frank Nuessel with:
Frank Nuessel United States
Edward Sapir United States
Michael Lempert United States
Bethan Benwell United Kingdom
Karen Ann Watson‐Gegeo United States
Tamar Katriel Israel
Pier Paolo Giglioli Lithuania
Anna Wierzbicka Australia
Michael Cronin Ireland
Merry White United States
Joy Hendry relative to Frank Nuessel United States Frank Nuessel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Frank Nuessel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joy Hendry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joy Hendry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joy Hendry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joy Hendry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joy Hendry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joy Hendry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joy Hendry. The network helps show where Joy Hendry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Joy Hendry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joy Hendry Line = papers co-authored together Joy Hendry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991397
2 1988139
3 199477
4 198758
5 200345
6 201236
7 198727
8 200526
9 198722
10 199922
11 199518
12 200315
13 199514
14
An Introduction to Social Anthropology : Other People's Worlds
199913
15 199612
16 198612
17 200011
18 200211
19 199411
20
Marriage in Changing Japan: Community & Society
198110

About Joy Hendry

Joy Hendry is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (1 paper) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (155 citations), Language and Linguistics (323 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations), Cultural Studies (104 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (107 citations). Joy Hendry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Masayoshi Shibatani, Merry White, William W. Kelly, Takie Sugiyama Lebra, William P. Lebra, Harumi Befu, Jonathan Webber, Sepp Linhart, Margaret Lock and Joseph Tobin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Japanese Studies, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Global Networks and Japan Forum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact