Josh DeClercq

38 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Josh DeClercq
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Family Practice 120
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 84
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 58
  • Economics and Econometrics 77
  • Hepatology 21
Replace Michiko Inaba with:
Michiko Inaba United States
Weilin Qi China
Shannon Cartier United States
Ansgar Hebborn Switzerland
Hélène Parisé United States
Evan Davies United States
Lauren J. Lee United States
Ibrahim E. Fahdi United States
Tami Wisniewski United States
Josh DeClercq relative to Michiko Inaba United States Michiko Inaba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Michiko Inaba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Josh DeClercq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josh DeClercq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh DeClercq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh DeClercq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josh DeClercq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh DeClercq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh DeClercq. The network helps show where Josh DeClercq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Josh DeClercq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Josh DeClercq Line = papers co-authored together Josh DeClercq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201991
2 201928
3 202024
4 202015
5 202114
6 202213
7 201611
8 202111
9 201911
10 202111
11 202310
12 20228
13 20237
14 20227
15 20227
16 19777
17 20217
18 20236
19 20196
20 20216

About Josh DeClercq

Josh DeClercq is a scholar working on Family Practice, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medication Adherence and Compliance (14 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (8 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (6 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (120 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (84 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (58 citations), Economics and Econometrics (77 citations) and Hepatology (21 citations). Josh DeClercq has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Bermuda. Frequent co-authors include Leena Choi, Autumn D. Zuckerman, Nisha Shah, David G. M. Mitchell, Nitin B. Jain, Anna R. Hemnes, Robert McCormick, Laurence D. Higgins, Gregory D. Ayers and John E. Kuhn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact