Joseph Tepperman

598 citations
28 papers · 492 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Joseph Tepperman

26 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Joseph Tepperman
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 170
  • Artificial Intelligence 430
  • Signal Processing 124
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 94
  • Computer Science Applications 8
Replace Óscar Saz with:
Óscar Saz Spain
Rajdip Dhillon United States
Silke M. Witt United States
Volker Strom United Kingdom
César González-Ferreras Spain
Jackson Liscombe United States
Julie Carson-Berndsen Ireland
Anastassia Loukina United States
Sheri Hunnicutt Sweden
Jette Viethen Australia
Joseph Tepperman relative to Óscar Saz Spain Óscar Saz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Óscar Saz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Tepperman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Tepperman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Tepperman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Tepperman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Tepperman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Tepperman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Tepperman. The network helps show where Joseph Tepperman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Tepperman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Tepperman Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Tepperman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006118
2 200657
3 201043
4 200738
5 200734
6 200732
7 200619
8 200619
9 200718
10 201017
11 200916
12 200812
13 200811
14 20088
15 20107
16 20096
17 20116
18 20076
19 20054
20 20094

About Joseph Tepperman

Joseph Tepperman is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Signal Processing and Physiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (14 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (13 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (12 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (3 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (170 citations), Artificial Intelligence (430 citations), Signal Processing (124 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (94 citations) and Computer Science Applications (8 citations). Joseph Tepperman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Shrikanth Narayanan, David Traum, S. Narayanan, Matthew Black, Sungbok Lee, Abe Kazemzadeh, Abeer Alwan, Patti Price, Margaret Heritage and Matteo Gerosa. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing and Speech Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact