Jackson Liscombe

847 citations
44 papers · 664 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jackson Liscombe

43 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Jackson Liscombe
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 275
  • Artificial Intelligence 338
  • Language and Linguistics 37
  • Computer Science Applications 11
  • Neurology 23
Replace William J. Barry with:
William J. Barry Germany
Ton G. Wempe Netherlands
Eva Strangert Sweden
Kjell O. E. Elenius Sweden
Michelle Cohn United States
Taniya Mishra United States
Kristin Precoda United States
Jennifer J. Venditti United States
Kirsty McDougall United Kingdom
Joaquim Llisterri Spain
Jackson Liscombe relative to William J. Barry Germany William J. Barry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
William J. Barry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jackson Liscombe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jackson Liscombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jackson Liscombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jackson Liscombe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jackson Liscombe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jackson Liscombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jackson Liscombe. The network helps show where Jackson Liscombe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jackson Liscombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jackson Liscombe Line = papers co-authored together Jackson Liscombe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200581
2 200379
3 200572
4 200371
5 200562
6 200932
7 200930
8 202124
9 200822
10 200817
11 201912
12 200911
13 201011
14 200610
15 200610
16 20098
17 20098
18 20228
19 20067
20 20087

About Jackson Liscombe

Jackson Liscombe is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 44 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (20 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (10 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (6 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (275 citations), Artificial Intelligence (338 citations), Language and Linguistics (37 citations), Computer Science Applications (11 citations) and Neurology (23 citations). Jackson Liscombe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Julia Hirschberg, Jennifer J. Venditti, Giuseppe Riccardi, Dilek Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, David Suendermann, Roberto Pieraccini, Keelan Evanini, Alexander Schmitt, Michael Neumann and Hardik Kothare. Their work appears in journals such as Language Resources and Evaluation, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Lecture notes in computer science, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing and Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact