Joseph Maher

536 citations
18 papers · 213 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Joseph Maher

17 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers

Joseph Maher
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Geometry and Topology 175
  • Mathematical Physics 145
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 37
  • Applied Mathematics 43
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 49
Replace Jean‐François Lafont with:
Jean‐François Lafont United States
Lyubomyr Zdomskyy Austria
Alessandro Sisto United Kingdom
G. Christopher Hruska United States
Indira Chatterji United States
Mark Hagen United Kingdom
Damian Osajda Poland
Mahan Mitra United States
Ravi Ramakrishna United States
Kevin Whyte United States
Joseph Maher relative to Jean‐François Lafont United States Jean‐François Lafont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jean‐François Lafont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Maher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Maher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Maher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Maher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Maher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Maher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Maher. The network helps show where Joseph Maher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Maher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Maher Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Maher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201843
2 201137
3 201826
4 201025
5 201218
6 201016
7
2 STATISTICS AND COMPRESSION OF SCL
201610
8 19997
9 20175
10 20165
11 20105
12
Word length statistics and Lyapunov exponents for Fuchsian groups with cusps
20155
13 20165
14 20102
15 20032
16 20241
17 20211
18 20220

About Joseph Maher

Joseph Maher is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Applied Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 18 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (16 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (15 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (4 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (3 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (2 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (2 papers), Energy Efficiency and Management (1 paper) and Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (175 citations), Mathematical Physics (145 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (37 citations), Applied Mathematics (43 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (49 citations). Joseph Maher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Giulio Tiozzo, Sébastien Houde, Danny Calegari, Alexander Lubotzky, J Rubinstein, Molly K. Macauley, Saul Schleimer, Jhih‐Shyang Shih, Ilya Kapovich and Samuel J. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Geometry & Topology, Algebraic & Geometric Topology, Duke Mathematical Journal, Journal of the London Mathematical Society and Groups Geometry and Dynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact