Joseph E. Armstrong

44 papers receiving 961 citations

Peers

Joseph E. Armstrong
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 675
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 258
  • Plant Science 483
  • Forestry 21
  • Molecular Biology 336
Replace Shu‐Mei Chang with:
Shu‐Mei Chang United States
Joseph Dauer United States
Gordon E. Uno United States
H. L. Billington United Kingdom
Ralph W. Preszler United States
Renee H. Petipas United States
Daniel Udovic United States
David B. Orr United States
J. R. King Canada
James S. Jacobs United States
Joseph E. Armstrong relative to Shu‐Mei Chang United States Shu‐Mei Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Shu‐Mei Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph E. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph E. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph E. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph E. Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph E. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph E. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph E. Armstrong. The network helps show where Joseph E. Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Joseph E. Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph E. Armstrong Line = papers co-authored together Joseph E. Armstrong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989136
2 200596
3 199367
4 199055
5 198952
6 198642
7 199739
8 198938
9 201232
10 200532
11 198930
12 201128
13 198527
14 199326
15 199726
16 197625
17 199325
18 198622
19
A Macroscopic and Microscopic Study of Compartmentalization and Wound Closure after Mechanical Wounding of Black Walnut Trees
198121
20 200519

About Joseph E. Armstrong

Joseph E. Armstrong is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (22 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (21 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (10 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (8 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (675 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (258 citations), Plant Science (483 citations), Forestry (21 citations) and Molecular Biology (336 citations). Joseph E. Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anthony K. Irvine, Marshall D. Sundberg, E. William Wischusen, Victoria A. Borowicz, James S. Fralish, Charles Heimsch, Roger C. Anderson, Andrew W. Douglas, Shirley C. Tucker and Peter K. Endress. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, Wood and Fiber Science, Biotropica and Oecologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact