Charles Heimsch

952 citations
34 papers · 539 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Heimsch

34 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Charles Heimsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Plant Science 360
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 107
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
  • Molecular Biology 190
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 27
Replace Edmund W. Sinnott with:
Edmund W. Sinnott United States
N. L. Bor United Kingdom
Will H. Blackwell United States
Agnes Arber United States
L. A. Andres United States
David Coupland United Kingdom
William H. Murdy United States
Hans Walter Lack Germany
Pedro Montserrat Spain
Ken Loach United States
Charles Heimsch relative to Edmund W. Sinnott United States Edmund W. Sinnott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Edmund W. Sinnott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Heimsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Heimsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Heimsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Heimsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Heimsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Heimsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Heimsch. The network helps show where Charles Heimsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Charles Heimsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Heimsch Line = papers co-authored together Charles Heimsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195882
2 200880
3 195177
4 196027
5 196426
6 197623
7 195719
8 197019
9 196018
10 195117
11 196915
12 197014
13 195213
14 197513
15 19769
16 19589
17 19699
18 19688
19 19638
20 19728

About Charles Heimsch

Charles Heimsch is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Mechanical Engineering and Cell Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (10 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (5 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (360 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (107 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations), Molecular Biology (190 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (27 citations). Charles Heimsch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include James L. Seago, John M. Byrne, Neal P. Thompson, Joseph E. Armstrong, Alan Graham, W. Gordon Whaley, Thompson Demetrio Pizzolato, Richard E. Blackwelder, A. R. Schrank and Orville Wyss. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Mycologia, Ecology, Science and Botanical Gazette.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact