Joseph C. Pearson
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- RNA Research and Splicing
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Papers in
-
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 6
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 4
- RNA Research and Splicing 2
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 5
- Co-authors
- William McGinnis (3 shared papers)Derek Lemons (1 shared paper)Stephen T. Crews (10 shared papers)Kimberly A. Mace (1 shared paper)Myung-Jin Kim (1 shared paper)Øyvind Drivenes (1 shared paper)Michelle T. Juarez (1 shared paper)Joseph D. Watson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Developmental Biology (3 papers)Development (2 papers)Current Biology (1 paper)Mechanisms of Development (1 paper)Nature Reviews Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Joseph C. Pearson
13 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Joseph C. Pearson's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Aging 42
- Molecular Biology 780
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 177
- Cancer Research 105
- Immunology 140
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph C. Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph C. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph C. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph C. Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph C. Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph C. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph C. Pearson. The network helps show where Joseph C. Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Joseph C. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 664 |
| 2 | 2005 | 185 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 86 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 0 |
About Joseph C. Pearson
Joseph C. Pearson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomaterials, Genetics and Immunology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (3 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (42 citations), Molecular Biology (780 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (177 citations), Cancer Research (105 citations) and Immunology (140 citations). Joseph C. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include William McGinnis, Derek Lemons, Stephen T. Crews, Kimberly A. Mace, Myung-Jin Kim, Øyvind Drivenes, Michelle T. Juarez, Joseph D. Watson, Lan Jiang and Daniel J. McKay. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Biology, Development, Current Biology, Mechanisms of Development and Nature Reviews Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.