José Pinto

103 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

José Pinto
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Nephrology 105
  • Transplantation 26
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 65
  • Rheumatology 114
  • Physiology 198
Replace Hiroyuki Kobayashi with:
Hiroyuki Kobayashi Japan
Nikolaos Nikiteas Greece
Thomas Schmid Austria
Yasuyuki Arai Japan
Ming‐Huei Chen United States
Kenji Ogata Japan
Kenichi Hakamada Japan
Igor M. Sauer Germany
Xinyu Xu China
Kyung Mo Kim South Korea
José Pinto relative to Hiroyuki Kobayashi Japan Hiroyuki Kobayashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Hiroyuki Kobayashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by José Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of José Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by José Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Pinto. The network helps show where José Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside José Pinto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with José Pinto Line = papers co-authored together José Pinto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007107
2 201591
3 201686
4 200886
5 198179
6 201773
7 201269
8 202351
9 201548
10 199544
11 201633
12 200928
13
Compliance in gout patients.
201121
14 201720
15 201420
16 199720
17 201819
18 201818
19 201617
20 201215

About José Pinto

José Pinto is a scholar working on Surgery, Rheumatology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (7 papers), Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (6 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (4 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (105 citations), Transplantation (26 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (65 citations), Rheumatology (114 citations) and Physiology (198 citations). José Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Portugal and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth De Francesco Daher, Geraldo Bezerra da Silva, Matthias E. Futschik, Rui S. R. Machado, Elvino José Guardão Barros, Juan D. Cañete, Dawson Turner, J. S. Cameron, M. Bewick and Susana Machado. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, Allergy, European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact