Jorge Osma

1.4k citations
79 papers · 904 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Jorge Osma

69 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers

Jorge Osma
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Applied Psychology 141
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 192
  • Clinical Psychology 279
  • Human-Computer Interaction 77
  • Social Psychology 176
Replace Martha R. Calamaras with:
Martha R. Calamaras United States
Debra Boeldt United States
Liviu A. Fodor Romania
Raymond A. Folen United States
Cristin D. Runfola United States
Dana Schultchen Germany
Mia Beck Lichtenstein Denmark
Chih‐Hsiang Yang United States
Natalie Ein Canada
Myra Altman United States
Jorge Osma relative to Martha R. Calamaras United States Martha R. Calamaras's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Martha R. Calamaras · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jorge Osma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jorge Osma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jorge Osma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jorge Osma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jorge Osma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jorge Osma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jorge Osma. The network helps show where Jorge Osma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jorge Osma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jorge Osma Line = papers co-authored together Jorge Osma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201666
2 202157
3 200455
4 200253
5 201351
6 201946
7 201741
8 201838
9 202127
10 202124
11 200824
12 202122
13 202022
14 200719
15 202118
16 201917
17 202016
18 202216
19 202216
20 202015

About Jorge Osma

Jorge Osma is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (16 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers) and Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (141 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (192 citations), Clinical Psychology (279 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (77 citations) and Social Psychology (176 citations). Jorge Osma has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Óscar Péris-Baquero, Carlos Suso‐Ribera, Cristina Botella, Azucena García‐Palacios, Alinne Z. Barrera, Rosa Baños, Ana Fonseca, Tobias Mettler, Juan Ramón Barrada and Soledad Quero. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Affective Disorders, PLoS ONE, Psicothema and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact