Joop de Wit
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 2%
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Urban Planning and Governance
Papers in
-
- Social and Economic Development in India 2
- Latin American socio-political dynamics 1
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 1
-
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges 4
- Urban Planning and Governance 2
- Co-authors
- Erhard Berner (1 shared paper)Isa Baud (1 shared paper)Nguyen Minh Quang (1 shared paper)Peter Nientied (1 shared paper)Georgina M. Gómez (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Public Administration (1 paper)Development and Change (1 paper)Community Development Journal (1 paper)Habitat International (1 paper)Nature Conservation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Joop de Wit
9 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Urban Studies 112
- Business and International Management 7
- Political Science and International Relations 82
- Public Administration 7
- Sociology and Political Science 80
Countries citing papers authored by Joop de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of Joop de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joop de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joop de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joop de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joop de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joop de Wit. The network helps show where Joop de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Joop de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 9 | Land governance of suburban areas of Vietnam: Dynamics and contestations of planning, housing and the environment | 2013 | 1 |
| 10 | ‘Prospects for India’s Urban Poor: Livelihoods and Mobility in Conditions of Informality and Middle Class Competition’ | 2010 | 1 |
| 11 | 2013 | 0 |
About Joop de Wit
Joop de Wit is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban and Rural Development Challenges (4 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (2 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (1 paper), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper), Latin American socio-political dynamics (1 paper), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper) and Community Development and Social Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (112 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations), Political Science and International Relations (82 citations), Public Administration (7 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (80 citations). Joop de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Erhard Berner, Isa Baud, Nguyen Minh Quang, Peter Nientied and Georgina M. Gómez. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Administration, Development and Change, Community Development Journal, Habitat International and Nature Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.