Countries where authors publish in Community Development Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Community Development Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Community Development Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Community Development Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Community Development Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Community Development Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Community Development Journal.
About Community Development Journal
The 1.7k papers published in Community Development Journal in the last decades have received a total of 22.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Community Development Journal usually cover Education (909 papers), Urban Studies (176 papers), General Social Sciences (73 papers), Development (52 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (91 papers) specifically the topics of Community and Sustainable Development (848 papers), Community Health and Development (187 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (87 papers), Local Governance and Planning (82 papers), Social Sciences and Policies (72 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (56 papers), Social Capital and Networks (55 papers) and Urban and Rural Development Challenges (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Community Development Journal are Andréa Cornwall, Peter Wells, Kirsty Blackstock, Glenn Laverack, Niamh McCrea, Luciana Lolich, Lucius J. S. Botes, Philip Kirk, Robyn Eversole and Martin Mowbray.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.