Jonathan Rush

31 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers

Jonathan Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Applied Psychology 64
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 137
  • Social Psychology 180
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 19
Replace Lizbeth Benson with:
Lizbeth Benson United States
Kazuhiro Nakazato Japan
Sierra B. Cronan United States
Margaret Kasimatis United States
Emily C Willroth United States
John F. Hunter United States
Melissa K. Weinberg Australia
Ryan Trettevik United States
Myoung‐Ho Hyun South Korea
Anne Congard France
Jonathan Rush relative to Lizbeth Benson United States Lizbeth Benson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Lizbeth Benson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Rush. The network helps show where Jonathan Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Rush Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010100
2 201471
3 202253
4 201242
5 202332
6 202130
7 201429
8 202027
9 201823
10 201923
11 201921
12 201620
13 202316
14 201016
15 202114
16 201511
17 202110
18 20179
19 20248
20 20176

About Jonathan Rush

Jonathan Rush is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology, Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Applied Psychology (64 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (137 citations), Social Psychology (180 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (19 citations). Jonathan Rush has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Scott M. Hofer, Gordon Hodson, Cara C. MacInnis, David M. Almeida, Frédérick M. E. Grouzet, Susan Turk Charles, Jennifer R. Piazza, Eric Scott Cerino, Jacqueline A. Mogle and Andrea Marie Piccinin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychology and Health, Annals of Behavioral Medicine and Psychology and Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact