Jonathan Revah
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Aging top 10%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Papers in
-
- Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms 6
-
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 5
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 1
- Co-authors
- Nicolas Buchon (7 shared papers)Brian P. Lazzaro (3 shared papers)David Duneau (4 shared papers)Philip Houtz (3 shared papers)Hannah Kondolf (2 shared papers)A. Dobson (2 shared papers)Parthive H. Patel (1 shared paper)Bruce A. Edgar (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- eLife (2 papers)BMC Biology (1 paper)Cell Reports (1 paper)G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (1 paper)PLoS Pathogens (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrancePortugal
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Revah
7 papers receiving 563 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Insect Science 290
- Aging 38
- Immunology 362
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 159
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 75
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Revah
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Revah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Revah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Revah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Revah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Revah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Revah. The network helps show where Jonathan Revah may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Revah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 94 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 22 |
About Jonathan Revah
Jonathan Revah is a scholar working on Immunology, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (6 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (1 paper), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (290 citations), Aging (38 citations), Immunology (362 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (159 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (75 citations). Jonathan Revah has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas Buchon, Brian P. Lazzaro, David Duneau, Philip Houtz, Hannah Kondolf, A. Dobson, Parthive H. Patel, Bruce A. Edgar, Jerome Korzelius and Christine Gläßer. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, BMC Biology, Cell Reports, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics and PLoS Pathogens.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.