Jonathan Rees

28 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Jonathan Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Urology 226
  • Pharmacy 51
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 35
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 23
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 4
Replace Bernadette Porter with:
Bernadette Porter United Kingdom
M Gawlicki United States
A Lowe-Strong United Kingdom
Joseph McDonnell Netherlands
José Tadeu Nunes Tamanini Brazil
Bernard Genesté France
Christine Thompson United States
Nannan Thirumavalavan United States
M D. Barber United States
Lucia Mathes United Kingdom
Jonathan Rees relative to Bernadette Porter United Kingdom Bernadette Porter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Bernadette Porter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Rees. The network helps show where Jonathan Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Rees Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001110
2 201772
3 201359
4 201532
5 200324
6 201520
7 202218
8 201714
9 202213
10 199512
11 201912
12 202210
13 20227
14 20237
15 20195
16 20144
17 20224
18 20224
19 20244
20 20063

About Jonathan Rees

Jonathan Rees is a scholar working on Urology, General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pharmacy and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (26 papers), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Health Services Management and Policy (1 paper), Nursing care and research (1 paper), Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper), Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (1 paper) and Urinary Tract Infections Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (226 citations), Pharmacy (51 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (35 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (23 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (4 citations). Jonathan Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Ciaran A. O’Boyle, R. MacDonagh, Michael G. Kirby, Marcus John Drake, Stefan De Wachter, Antonella Giannantoni, Geoffrey Ian Hackett, Matthias Oelke, Philip Van Kerrebroeck and Karel Everaert. Their work appears in journals such as European Urology Focus, British Journal of Urology, International Journal of Clinical Practice, British Journal of General Practice and International Urogynecology Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact