British Journal of Urology

10.8k papers and 311.2k indexed citations

About

The 10.8k papers published in British Journal of Urology in the last decades have received a total of 311.2k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Urology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.9k papers), Surgery (4.1k papers) and Urology (3.7k papers) specifically the topics of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2.6k papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2.1k papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Urology are Paul Abrams, Christopher R. Chapple, Ian Milsom, Claus G. Roehrborn, Anthony R. Mundy, James Gillespie, John M. Fitzpatrick, Zoë Kopp, Prokar Dasgupta and Mark Emberton.

In The Last Decade

British Journal of Urology

10.4k papers receiving 302.1k citations

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Urology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Urology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Urology.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Urology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Urology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Urology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Urology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026