Jonathan Pugh

1.9k citations
66 papers · 975 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Pugh

62 papers receiving 882 citations

Peers

Jonathan Pugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 331
  • Business and International Management 26
  • Neurology 135
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Health 50
Replace Alexandra Alvergne with:
Alexandra Alvergne United Kingdom
Josephine Johnston United States
Karen Forrest United States
Tansey Em United Kingdom
Elselijn Kingma United Kingdom
Cameron Watson United Kingdom
Patricia Navas Spain
Nathan Roth United States
Elisa Perego Italy
Robert E. Bartholomew Australia
Jonathan Pugh relative to Alexandra Alvergne United Kingdom Alexandra Alvergne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13×
Alexandra Alvergne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Pugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Pugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Pugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Pugh. The network helps show where Jonathan Pugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Pugh Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Pugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201590
2 201674
3 202062
4 201554
5 201849
6 201743
7 202029
8 201828
9 201628
10 202127
11 201926
12 202226
13 201726
14 201622
15 202221
16 202320
17 200019
18 201518
19 202017
20 202217

About Jonathan Pugh

Jonathan Pugh is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Neurology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 975 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (20 papers), Ethics in medical practice (17 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (7 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (331 citations), Business and International Management (26 citations), Neurology (135 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations) and Health (50 citations). Jonathan Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julian Savulescu, Hannah Maslen, Thomas Douglas, Dominic Wilkinson, Christopher Gyngell, Tipu Z. Aziz, Laurie Pycroft, Guy Kahane, Anders Sandberg and Christopher J. A. Pugh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Bioethics, Neuroethics, AJOB Empirical Bioethics and Journal of Law and the Biosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact