Jonathan Pugh

1.8k citations
60 papers · 823 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Pugh

59 papers receiving 785 citations

Peers

Jonathan Pugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 280
  • Business and International Management 24
  • Neurology 138
  • Health 56
  • Clinical Psychology 126
Replace Joelle M. Abi-Rached with:
Joelle M. Abi-Rached United Kingdom
Karen Forrest United States
Robert E. Bartholomew Australia
Virginia Macdonald Australia
Fernando Lolas Stepke Chile
Elselijn Kingma United Kingdom
Anita Schick Germany
Sendy Caffarra Spain
Victoria L. Fields United States
Louisa A. Stark United States
Jonathan Pugh relative to Joelle M. Abi-Rached United Kingdom Joelle M. Abi-Rached's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Joelle M. Abi-Rached · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Pugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Pugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Pugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Pugh. The network helps show where Jonathan Pugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Pugh Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Pugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201579
2 201672
3 202054
4 201546
5 201739
6 201834
7 201825
8 202225
9 201925
10 202024
11 201724
12 202123
13 201623
14 202220
15 200018
16 201615
17 202014
18 202314
19 202014
20 202213

About Jonathan Pugh

Jonathan Pugh is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Neurology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (17 papers), Ethics in medical practice (12 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (280 citations), Business and International Management (24 citations), Neurology (138 citations), Health (56 citations) and Clinical Psychology (126 citations). Jonathan Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Julian Savulescu, Hannah Maslen, Thomas Douglas, Dominic Wilkinson, Christopher Gyngell, Tipu Z. Aziz, Laurie Pycroft, Guy Kahane, Anders Sandberg and L. J. Bourgeois. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Neuroethics, Bioethics, AJOB Empirical Bioethics and Clinical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact