AJOB Empirical Bioethics

282 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 282 papers published in AJOB Empirical Bioethics in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in AJOB Empirical Bioethics usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (187 papers), General Health Professions (142 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (62 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (111 papers), Ethics in medical practice (84 papers) and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AJOB Empirical Bioethics are Leroy R. Thacker, Ann B. Hamric, Elizabeth G. Epstein, Phyllis Whitehead, Nancy Kass, Jessica Mozersky, Puneet Chawla Sahota, Julian Savulescu, Lauren E. Ellis and Bernice S. Elger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in AJOB Empirical Bioethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AJOB Empirical Bioethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AJOB Empirical Bioethics.

Countries where authors publish in AJOB Empirical Bioethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AJOB Empirical Bioethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AJOB Empirical Bioethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AJOB Empirical Bioethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025