Jonathan Lewis

39 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Jonathan Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Health Informatics 21
  • Safety Research 32
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 99
  • Information Systems and Management 23
  • General Health Professions 84
Replace Ting Dong with:
Ting Dong United States
Jukka Varelius Finland
Caroline White United Kingdom
Olivia S O'Neill Canada
Andria Bianchi Canada
Carl J. Sheperis United States
Minerva Rivas Velarde Switzerland
Azra Daei Iran
David T. Ozar United States
Hotaka Maeda United States
Jonathan Lewis relative to Ting Dong United States Ting Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Ting Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Lewis. The network helps show where Jonathan Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Lewis Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202178
2 202133
3 202228
4 202121
5 202215
6 201914
7 202213
8 201911
9
The European Ceiling on Human Rights
200711
10 202010
11 202010
12 20218
13 20237
14 20207
15 20217
16 20245
17 20095
18
The Cat and the Devil and Finnegans Wake
19924
19 20224
20 20094

About Jonathan Lewis

Jonathan Lewis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Civil and Structural Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (10 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers), Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis (4 papers), Construction Engineering and Safety (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (21 citations), Safety Research (32 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (99 citations), Information Systems and Management (23 citations) and General Health Professions (84 citations). Jonathan Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian D. Earp, Søren Holm, Carl L. Hart, Mohammad Hosseini, Bert Gordijn, Ivar R. Hannikainen, Hub Zwart, Vilius Dranseika, Péter Kakuk and Udo Schüklenk. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Ethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, The American Journal of Bioethics, Bioethics and AJOB Empirical Bioethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact