Jonathan Howe
Impact in
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Papers in
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 8
-
- Animal testing and alternatives 4
- Co-authors
- Rosalie K. Elespuru (2 shared papers)Kevin P. Cross (2 shared papers)Patricia A. Escobar (2 shared papers)Leon F. Stankowski (2 shared papers)Errol Zeiger (2 shared papers)David M. DeMarini (2 shared papers)Richard V. Williams (2 shared papers)Ulla Plappert‐Helbig (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (4 papers)Mutagenesis (3 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (1 paper)Archives of Toxicology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Howe
9 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Chemical Health and Safety 5
- Cancer Research 103
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 60
- Small Animals 28
- Plant Science 44
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Howe
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Howe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Howe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Howe. The network helps show where Jonathan Howe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 1 |
About Jonathan Howe
Jonathan Howe is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (2 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1 paper), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations), Cancer Research (103 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (60 citations), Small Animals (28 citations) and Plant Science (44 citations). Jonathan Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Rosalie K. Elespuru, Kevin P. Cross, Patricia A. Escobar, Leon F. Stankowski, Errol Zeiger, David M. DeMarini, Richard V. Williams, Ulla Plappert‐Helbig, Mike O’Donovan and Yoshifumi Uno. Their work appears in journals such as Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, Mutagenesis, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology and Archives of Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.