Thomas H. Smith

2.1k citations
98 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

    • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 6
    • Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms 18
    • Agricultural pest management studies 10
    • Soybean genetics and cultivation 8

Thomas H. Smith

92 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Hepatology 158
  • Toxicology 47
  • Hematology 143
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 77
  • Organic Chemistry 214
Replace Krishna Menon with:
Krishna Menon United States
Masanobu Naruto Japan
Said A. Goueli United States
Wei Cui United States
Teruhiko Inoue Japan
Yvonne Ottaviano United States
Jianmin Sun China
Douglas C. Marchion United States
Hsin‐Shih Wang Taiwan
Brian Thompson United States
Thomas H. Smith relative to Krishna Menon United States Krishna Menon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Krishna Menon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012112
2 201385
3 202076
4 201275
5 197771
6 201564
7 197951
8 201550
9 200646
10 197636
11 197635
12 201732
13 199730
14 201627
15 200727
16 202027
17 202127
18 201422
19 199720
20 197720

About Thomas H. Smith

Thomas H. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Cancer Research, Oncology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (18 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (10 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (8 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (7 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (158 citations), Toxicology (47 citations), Hematology (143 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (77 citations) and Organic Chemistry (214 citations). Thomas H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David W. Henry, JoAnn Trejo, Helen Y. Wu, Allan N. Fujiwara, William W. Lee, K. Peter Pauls, Allen P. Liu, Huilan Lin, Gaurav Garg and Achuthan Sourianarayanane. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Natural Products, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, The FASEB Journal and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact