Thomas H. Smith

2.1k citations
103 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

    • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 6
    • Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms 18
    • Agricultural pest management studies 10
    • Soybean genetics and cultivation 8

Thomas H. Smith

95 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Hepatology 120
  • Toxicology 50
  • Hematology 148
  • Organic Chemistry 237
  • Cancer Research 104
Replace Krishna Menon with:
Krishna Menon United States
Masanobu Naruto Japan
Said A. Goueli United States
Teruhiko Inoue Japan
Lowell M. Greenbaum United States
Jianmin Sun China
Wei Cui United States
Tonghui Ma China
Douglas C. Marchion United States
G. A. Turner United Kingdom
Thomas H. Smith relative to Krishna Menon United States Krishna Menon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Krishna Menon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012115
2 201391
3 202078
4 201277
5 197775
6 201568
7 197955
8 201553
9 200651
10 197643
11 197637
12 201735
13 199732
14 202128
15 201628
16 202027
17 200727
18 197723
19 201422
20 202320

About Thomas H. Smith

Thomas H. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 103 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (18 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (11 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (10 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (8 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (120 citations), Toxicology (50 citations), Hematology (148 citations), Organic Chemistry (237 citations) and Cancer Research (104 citations). Thomas H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David W. Henry, JoAnn Trejo, Helen Y. Wu, Allan N. Fujiwara, William W. Lee, K. Peter Pauls, Allen P. Liu, Huilan Lin, Achuthan Sourianarayanane and Arthur J. McCullough. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Natural Products, American Journal of Roentgenology, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and The FASEB Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact