Jonathan E. Farley
Impact in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Hereditary Neurological Disorders
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
- Neurology top 10%
- Neurological disorders and treatments
Papers in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 2
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling 1
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Flávia C. Nery (2 shared papers)Xandra O. Breakefield (2 shared papers)Jeffrey W. Hewett (1 shared paper)Daniel Irimia (1 shared paper)Gerhard Wiche (1 shared paper)Brian P. Niland (1 shared paper)Yuqing Li (1 shared paper)Juan Zeng (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Neuron (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Cell Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyJapan
In The Last Decade
Jonathan E. Farley
10 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 170
- Neurology 124
- Cell Biology 116
- Biophysics 27
- Aging 6
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan E. Farley
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan E. Farley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan E. Farley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan E. Farley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan E. Farley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan E. Farley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan E. Farley. The network helps show where Jonathan E. Farley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan E. Farley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 89 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 82 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 1 |
About Jonathan E. Farley
Jonathan E. Farley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Cell Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (1 paper), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (1 paper), Nuclear Structure and Function (1 paper) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (170 citations), Neurology (124 citations), Cell Biology (116 citations), Biophysics (27 citations) and Aging (6 citations). Jonathan E. Farley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Flávia C. Nery, Xandra O. Breakefield, Jeffrey W. Hewett, Daniel Irimia, Gerhard Wiche, Brian P. Niland, Yuqing Li, Juan Zeng, Arnoud Sonnenberg and Lukas Jakob Neukomm. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron, Scientific Reports and Journal of Cell Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.