Jonathan D. Jacobs

666 citations
11 papers · 294 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 3
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 1
    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 6

Jonathan D. Jacobs

10 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Jonathan D. Jacobs
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • History and Philosophy of Science 133
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 221
  • Philosophy 200
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 62
  • Religious studies 15
Replace Ricki Bliss with:
Ricki Bliss United States
Joshua Hoffman United States
Matjaž Potrč Slovenia
Jeffrey E. Brower United States
Einar Duenger Bøhn Norway
Nikk Effingham United Kingdom
Penelope Mackie United Kingdom
Natalja Deng South Korea
A. J. Cotnoir United Kingdom
Ben Caplan United States
Jonathan D. Jacobs relative to Ricki Bliss United States Ricki Bliss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Ricki Bliss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan D. Jacobs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan D. Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan D. Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan D. Jacobs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan D. Jacobs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan D. Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan D. Jacobs. The network helps show where Jonathan D. Jacobs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan D. Jacobs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan D. Jacobs Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan D. Jacobs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2011110
2 200993
3 201527
4 201325
5 200319
6 20107
7
CAUSAL POWERS: A NEO-ARISTOTELIAN METAPHYSIC
20075
8 20094
9 20173
10
Why Is Virtue Naturally Pleasing
19951
11
Metaethics and Teleology
20010

About Jonathan D. Jacobs

Jonathan D. Jacobs is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Archeology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (1 paper) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (133 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (221 citations), Philosophy (200 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (62 citations) and Religious studies (15 citations). Jonathan D. Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Timothy R O'Connor and Robert J. Hartman. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophical Papers, The Monist, Faith and Philosophy and European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact