Jonathan D. Jacobs

659 citations
9 papers · 209 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
    • Philosophy and History of Science 3
    • Evolution and Science Education 1

Jonathan D. Jacobs

8 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

Jonathan D. Jacobs
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • History and Philosophy of Science 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 171
  • Philosophy 136
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 36
  • Religious studies 4
Replace Matjaž Potrč with:
Matjaž Potrč Slovenia
Ricki Bliss United States
Joshua Hoffman United States
Crawford L. Elder United States
Nikk Effingham United Kingdom
Penelope Mackie United Kingdom
Jamin Asay Hong Kong
André Gallois Australia
Neil Williams United States
Michael Jubien United States
Jonathan D. Jacobs relative to Matjaž Potrč Slovenia Matjaž Potrč's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Matjaž Potrč · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan D. Jacobs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan D. Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan D. Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan D. Jacobs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan D. Jacobs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan D. Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan D. Jacobs. The network helps show where Jonathan D. Jacobs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan D. Jacobs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan D. Jacobs Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan D. Jacobs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201189
2 200987
3 200318
4 20106
5 20093
6 20173
7
CAUSAL POWERS: A NEO-ARISTOTELIAN METAPHYSIC
20072
8
Why Is Virtue Naturally Pleasing
19951
9
Metaethics and Teleology
20010

About Jonathan D. Jacobs

Jonathan D. Jacobs is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Archeology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (114 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (171 citations), Philosophy (136 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (36 citations) and Religious studies (4 citations). Jonathan D. Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Timothy O’Connor and Robert J. Hartman. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, The Monist, Faith and Philosophy, Philosophical Papers and European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact