Jonathan Boone

644 citations
28 papers · 390 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 4
    • Ureteral procedures and complications 2
    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 2
    • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment 2

Jonathan Boone

25 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Jonathan Boone
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 53
  • Reproductive Medicine 36
  • Otorhinolaryngology 12
  • Oncology 61
  • Biochemistry 14
Replace Ching-Pei Chen with:
Ching-Pei Chen Taiwan
Ali Akhavan Iran
Caibin Fan China
D. N. Rana United Kingdom
Mirela Gherghe Romania
Pankaj Singhal United States
Ai Dozen Japan
Kanto Shozu Japan
Paul J. J. M. Klinkhamer Netherlands
J. S. Dinnen United Kingdom
Jonathan Boone relative to Ching-Pei Chen Taiwan Ching-Pei Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Ching-Pei Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Boone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Boone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Boone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Boone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Boone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Boone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Boone. The network helps show where Jonathan Boone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Boone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Boone Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Boone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201556
2 201253
3 201248
4 201541
5 201536
6 202024
7 200919
8 202219
9 201316
10 201615
11 201313
12 201910
13 20207
14 20227
15 20186
16 20194
17 20124
18 20233
19 20172
20 20162

About Jonathan Boone

Jonathan Boone is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (53 citations), Reproductive Medicine (36 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (12 citations), Oncology (61 citations) and Biochemistry (14 citations). Jonathan Boone has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include J. Michael Straughn, Warner K. Huh, Britt Erickson, Donald J. Buchsbaum, Janelle M. Fauci, Zachary C. Dobbin, Kellie E. Schneider, Jenny M. Whitworth, Kristopher J. Kimball and Larry C. Kilgore. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Journal of Gynecologic Oncology and IEEE Engineering Management Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact