Ching-Pei Chen

720 citations
41 papers · 565 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ching-Pei Chen

35 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Ching-Pei Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 52
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 122
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 82
  • Cancer Research 42
  • Control and Systems Engineering 73
Replace Iulia Andraș with:
Iulia Andraș Romania
Yiming Ni China
Magnus G. Olsson Sweden
Stefano Gidaro Italy
Jorn op den Buijs Netherlands
Junwen Huang China
Jianjun Yuan China
Dieter H. Boehm Germany
Ching-Pei Chen relative to Iulia Andraș Romania Iulia Andraș's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Iulia Andraș · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching-Pei Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching-Pei Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching-Pei Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching-Pei Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching-Pei Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching-Pei Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching-Pei Chen. The network helps show where Ching-Pei Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching-Pei Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching-Pei Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ching-Pei Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199996
2 200065
3 201363
4 200549
5 201431
6 201230
7 200629
8 201025
9 201620
10 200618
11 200516
12 201913
13 201812
14 202111
15 202010
16 20188
17 20157
18 20227
19 20137
20 20196

About Ching-Pei Chen

Ching-Pei Chen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (5 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (5 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (3 papers), Robotic Locomotion and Control (3 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (2 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers) and Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (52 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (122 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (82 citations), Cancer Research (42 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (73 citations). Ching-Pei Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Guang‐Uei Hung, John Aplin, Teresa Haigh, Carolyn Jones, Pei‐Chun Lin, Lin Wan-Yu, Wei-Hsi Chen, Yang Yang, Hsinyu Lee and Ya‐Wen Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Medical Sciences, Clinical Therapeutics and Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact