Daniel W. Carruth

88 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel W. Carruth
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 424
  • Human-Computer Interaction 211
  • Automotive Engineering 424
  • Social Psychology 598
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 94
Replace Mohammed Hossny with:
Mohammed Hossny Australia
Jwu‐Sheng Hu Taiwan
Berthold Färber Germany
Errol R. Hoffmann Australia
Paul Jennings United Kingdom
Andrew Liu United States
Fernando García Spain
M. M. van Paassen Netherlands
R. Wade Allen United States
Walter W. Wierwille United States
Daniel W. Carruth relative to Mohammed Hossny Australia Mohammed Hossny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Mohammed Hossny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Carruth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Carruth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Carruth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Carruth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Carruth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Carruth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Carruth. The network helps show where Daniel W. Carruth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Carruth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Carruth Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Carruth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017210
2 2017198
3 2018169
4 2019149
5 2017101
6 201798
7 201949
8 202034
9 202033
10 202332
11 201829
12 202227
13 201924
14 201923
15 201822
16 202221
17 201918
18 201718
19 202016
20 202315

About Daniel W. Carruth

Daniel W. Carruth is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Automotive Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (18 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (17 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (13 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (12 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (11 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (10 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (8 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (424 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (211 citations), Automotive Engineering (424 citations), Social Psychology (598 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (94 citations). Daniel W. Carruth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Shuchisnigdha Deb, Lesley Strawderman, Teena M. Garrison, Christopher R. Hudson, Matthew Doude, C. Goodin, Brian Smith, Janice L. DuBien, Harish Chander and Adam C. Knight. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Electronics, Sensors, IEEE Access and IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact