Daniel W. Carruth

86 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel W. Carruth
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 429
  • Human-Computer Interaction 212
  • Automotive Engineering 419
  • Social Psychology 602
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 105
Replace Omer Tsimhoni with:
Omer Tsimhoni United States
Jwu‐Sheng Hu Taiwan
Mohammed Hossny Australia
Errol R. Hoffmann Australia
Berthold Färber Germany
Nicola Bellotto United Kingdom
M. M. van Paassen Netherlands
Paul Jennings United Kingdom
Andrew Liu United States
Fernando García Spain
Daniel W. Carruth relative to Omer Tsimhoni United States Omer Tsimhoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Omer Tsimhoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Carruth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Carruth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Carruth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Carruth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Carruth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Carruth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Carruth. The network helps show where Daniel W. Carruth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Carruth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Carruth Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Carruth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017205
2 2017197
3 2018166
4 2019139
5 201796
6 201793
7 201947
8 202032
9 202031
10 202330
11 201829
12 202225
13 201923
14 201922
15 201821
16 202220
17 201718
18 201918
19 202016
20 202315

About Daniel W. Carruth

Daniel W. Carruth is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Automotive Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (17 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (17 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (13 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (12 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (11 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (10 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (9 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (429 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (212 citations), Automotive Engineering (419 citations), Social Psychology (602 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (105 citations). Daniel W. Carruth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Shuchisnigdha Deb, Lesley Strawderman, Teena M. Garrison, Christopher R. Hudson, Matthew Doude, C. Goodin, Brian Smith, Janice L. DuBien, Harish Chander and Adam C. Knight. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Electronics, Sensors, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems and IEEE Access.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact