Jon Warren

527 citations
28 papers · 260 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Warren

26 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Jon Warren
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Statistics and Probability 193
  • Mathematical Physics 206
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 58
  • Finance 36
  • Condensed Matter Physics 44
Replace Hideki Tanemura with:
Hideki Tanemura Japan
Joseph Najnudel Switzerland
Balázs Ráth Hungary
Nikos Zygouras United Kingdom
Igor Kortchemski France
Nicola Kistler Germany
Augusto Teixeira Brazil
Bruno Schapira France
Jean‐François Marckert France
Elliot Paquette United States
Jon Warren relative to Hideki Tanemura Japan Hideki Tanemura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13×
Hideki Tanemura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Warren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Warren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Warren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Warren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Warren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Warren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Warren. The network helps show where Jon Warren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jon Warren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Warren Line = papers co-authored together Jon Warren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200757
2 200928
3 201522
4 200819
5 200818
6
Consistent families of Brownian motions and stochastic flows of kernels
200917
7 200916
8 202115
9 200210
10 20005
11 20235
12 20054
13 20084
14 20094
15 20094
16 20194
17 20154
18 20064
19 20063
20 20203

About Jon Warren

Jon Warren is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Finance, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (20 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (12 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (10 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (9 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (7 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (4 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (4 papers) and Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (193 citations), Mathematical Physics (206 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (58 citations), Finance (36 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (44 citations). Jon Warren has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Neil O’Connell, A. B. Dieker, Saul Jacka, Jonathan P. Keating, Tomohiro Sasamoto, Patrik L. Ferrari, Alexei Borodin, Michael Prähofer, Yueyun Hu and Shinzo Watanabe. Their work appears in journals such as Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Electronic Journal of Probability, Advances in Applied Probability, Annales de l Institut Henri Poincaré Probabilités et Statistiques and Lecture notes in mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact