Jon Carlson

165 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Jon Carlson
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Algebra and Number Theory 798
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 490
  • Geometry and Topology 1.2k
  • Mathematical Physics 828
  • Clinical Psychology 232
Replace James Arthur with:
James Arthur United Kingdom
W. Stephen Wilson United States
Stephen Α. Mitchell United States
John Coates United Kingdom
Martin Olsson United States
Joel Anderson Netherlands
Marshall M. Cohen United States
James McKernan United States
Nathanial P. Brown United States
Paul Garrett United States
Jon Carlson relative to James Arthur United Kingdom James Arthur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James Arthur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Carlson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Carlson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Carlson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Carlson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Carlson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Carlson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Carlson. The network helps show where Jon Carlson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Carlson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Carlson Line = papers co-authored together Jon Carlson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 185 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983115
2 199775
3 198457
4 199246
5 200043
6 198642
7 200442
8 199641
9 198741
10
Modules and Group Algebras
199639
11 200337
12 200536
13 200635
14 199631
15 199431
16 199030
17
Consultation: Creating School-Based Interventions
199429
18 200829
19 198627
20 196926

About Jon Carlson

Jon Carlson is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 185 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (55 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (44 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (36 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (35 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (34 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (24 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (17 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (798 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (490 citations), Geometry and Topology (1.2k citations), Mathematical Physics (828 citations) and Clinical Psychology (232 citations). Jon Carlson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David J. Benson, Jacques Thévenaz, Jeremy Rickard, D. J. Benson, Don Dinkmeyer, Len Sperry, Daniel K. Nakano, Richard E. Watts, Eric M. Friedlander and Maurice Auslander. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematische Zeitschrift and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact