John Wermer

3.4k citations
94 papers · 2.1k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

John Wermer

81 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John Wermer
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Algebra and Number Theory 702
  • Applied Mathematics 1.4k
  • Geometry and Topology 786
  • Mathematical Physics 806
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 377
Replace Carl M. Pearcy with:
Carl M. Pearcy United States
Peter Fillmore Canada
Ronald George Douglas United States
Thomas Ransford Canada
G. Lumer Belgium
Per Enflo United States
Arne Beurling United States
Yoav Benyamini Israel
Edward Bierstone Canada
Н. К. Никольский Russia
John Wermer relative to Carl M. Pearcy United States Carl M. Pearcy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Carl M. Pearcy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Wermer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Wermer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wermer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wermer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Wermer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wermer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wermer. The network helps show where John Wermer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John Wermer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Wermer Line = papers co-authored together John Wermer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982252
2 1955176
3 197683
4 196880
5 195879
6 199876
7 195275
8 195474
9 195259
10 196158
11 196354
12 196048
13 196245
14 195345
15 198544
16 197541
17 196541
18 195541
19 195835
20 196434

About John Wermer

John Wermer is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 94 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (22 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (21 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (13 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (10 papers), Mathematics and Applications (9 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (8 papers) and Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (702 citations), Applied Mathematics (1.4k citations), Geometry and Topology (786 citations), Mathematical Physics (806 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (377 citations). John Wermer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include I. M. Singer, Herbert J. Alexander, Lars Hörmander, Walter Rudin, Kenneth A. Hoffman, Brian J. Cole, Karel de Leeuw, Thomas Banchoff, Nessim Sibony and Brian J. Cole. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematische Annalen, Lecture notes in mathematics, Annals of Mathematics and Pacific Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact