John Wermer

3.4k citations
71 papers · 1.9k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

John Wermer

63 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John Wermer
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Algebra and Number Theory 629
  • Applied Mathematics 1.2k
  • Geometry and Topology 707
  • Mathematical Physics 715
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 340
Replace Peter Fillmore with:
Peter Fillmore Canada
Mahlon M. Day United States
Ronald G. Douglas United States
G. Lumer Belgium
Reinhold Meise Germany
Linda Preiss Rothschild United States
Arne Beurling United States
Edward Bierstone Canada
Jim Agler United States
Leo Sario United States
John Wermer relative to Peter Fillmore Canada Peter Fillmore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Peter Fillmore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Wermer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Wermer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wermer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wermer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Wermer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wermer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wermer. The network helps show where John Wermer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John Wermer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Wermer Line = papers co-authored together John Wermer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982223
2 1955169
3 195874
4 196872
5 197672
6 195469
7 199864
8 195263
9 196156
10 196354
11 195249
12 196046
13 196245
14 195338
15 197538
16 198537
17 196537
18 195533
19 195830
20 196030

About John Wermer

John Wermer is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (21 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (17 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (12 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (9 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (8 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (8 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (7 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (629 citations), Applied Mathematics (1.2k citations), Geometry and Topology (707 citations), Mathematical Physics (715 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (340 citations). John Wermer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include I. M. Singer, H. Alexander, Lars Hörmander, Walter Rudin, Kenneth A. Hoffman, K. de Leeuw, Andrew Browder, Nessim Sibony, Thomas Banchoff and Brian Cole. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematische Annalen, Annals of Mathematics, Pacific Journal of Mathematics and Duke Mathematical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact