John W. Cain

768 citations
31 papers · 516 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Cain

28 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

John W. Cain
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 181
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 104
  • Pharmacology 84
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 55
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 25
Replace Trung T. Ngo with:
Trung T. Ngo Australia
Key Dismukes United States
Kiminori Isaki Japan
Christine M. Embury United States
Klaudius Kalcher Austria
Hilary Naylor United States
Sevdalina Kandilarova Bulgaria
Utako Birgit Barnikol Germany
Benjamin A. Seitzman United States
Byoung Woo Kim United States
John W. Cain relative to Trung T. Ngo Australia Trung T. Ngo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Trung T. Ngo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Cain. The network helps show where John W. Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Cain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Cain Line = papers co-authored together John W. Cain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997122
2 199488
3 199445
4
Poor response to fluoxetine: underlying depression, serotonergic overstimulation, or a "therapeutic window"?
199239
5 202030
6 200929
7 201629
8 200718
9 202015
10 200415
11 198614
12 200811
13 20069
14 20079
15 20088
16 20246
17 19945
18 20204
19 20074
20
Taking Math to Heart: Mathematical Challenges in Cardiac Electrophysiology
20113

About John W. Cain

John W. Cain is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 31 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (181 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (104 citations), Pharmacology (84 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (55 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (25 citations). John W. Cain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David G. Schaeffer, Howard P. Roffwarg, A. John Rush, Roseanne Armitage, Madhukar H. Trivedi, Daniel J. Gauthier, Mark Hyman Rapaport, E. H. Uhlenhuth, Mark H. Pollack and Steven A. Rasmussen. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Mathematical Biology, Physical review. E and SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact