John Venz

619 citations
22 papers · 404 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Venz

22 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

John Venz
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Clinical Psychology 206
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 25
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
  • Social Psychology 53
Replace Danielle A. Young with:
Danielle A. Young United States
Marissa J. Luft United States
Jacalyn J. Robert McComb United States
K.M.L. Huijbregts Netherlands
María Ángeles García‐León Spain
Renee Slembarski United States
Mauro V. Mendlowicz Brazil
Valerija Sipos Germany
Sara E. Field United States
Ashley A. Moskovich United States
John Venz relative to Danielle A. Young United States Danielle A. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Danielle A. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Venz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Venz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Venz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Venz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Venz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Venz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Venz. The network helps show where John Venz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Venz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Venz Line = papers co-authored together John Venz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019100
2 202057
3 201654
4 202029
5 201726
6 201924
7 202122
8 201815
9 202112
10 201811
11 20209
12 20227
13 20217
14 20207
15 20236
16 20176
17 20224
18 20183
19 20212
20 20221

About John Venz

John Venz is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Applied Psychology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 22 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (206 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations) and Social Psychology (53 citations). John Venz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lars Pieper, Katja Beesdo‐Baum, Catharina Voß, Michael Höfler, Marcel Miché, Jürgen Hoyer, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Thomas Goschke, Gerhard Bühringer and Michael N. Smolka. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Depression and Anxiety, BMC Psychiatry, BMC Psychology and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact