John Thrasher

769 citations
28 papers · 263 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Thrasher

23 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

John Thrasher
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Safety Research 46
  • Philosophy 55
  • Political Science and International Relations 115
  • Sociology and Political Science 135
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
Replace Peter Westen with:
Peter Westen United States
Adina Schwartz United States
A. T. Nuyen Australia
Stanley I. Benn Australia
Kevin Vallier United States
Ronald J. Allen Philippines
Sivan Hirsch‐Hoefler Israel
Otfried Höffe Germany
Stephen Everson United Kingdom
Gerald C. MacCallum United States
John Thrasher relative to Peter Westen United States Peter Westen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Peter Westen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Thrasher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Thrasher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Thrasher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Thrasher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Thrasher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Thrasher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Thrasher. The network helps show where John Thrasher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Thrasher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Thrasher Line = papers co-authored together John Thrasher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201746
2 201346
3
Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract
199631
4 201828
5 201828
6 201314
7 202211
8 201710
9 20198
10 20156
11 20156
12 20205
13 20185
14 20233
15 20123
16 20182
17 20202
18 20132
19 20192
20 20112

About John Thrasher

John Thrasher is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (46 citations), Philosophy (55 citations), Political Science and International Relations (115 citations), Sociology and Political Science (135 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations). John Thrasher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Vallier, Toby Handfield, Klaus Abbink, Lata Gangadharan, Fred D’Agostino, Gerald Gaus, Jennifer E. Copp, Thomas G. Blomberg, Daniel Halliday and Shaun Nichols. Their work appears in journals such as Social Philosophy and Policy, The Journal of Politics, Synthese, Public Choice and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact