New Theatre Quarterly

813 papers and 1.5k indexed citations

About

The 813 papers published in New Theatre Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in New Theatre Quarterly usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (552 papers), Sociology and Political Science (238 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (141 papers) specifically the topics of Theatre and Performance Studies (539 papers), Irish and British Studies (139 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Theatre Quarterly are Derek Paget, Michael L. Quinn, Sara Houston, Matthew Reason, Baz Kershaw, Eugênio Barba, Cathy Turner, Erika Fischer‐Lichte, Mick Wallis and Patrice Pavis.

In The Last Decade

New Theatre Quarterly

389 papers receiving 899 citations

Fields of papers published in New Theatre Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Theatre Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Theatre Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in New Theatre Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Theatre Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Theatre Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Theatre Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026