John Stanback

52 papers receiving 882 citations

Peers

John Stanback
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 523
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 355
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 72
  • General Health Professions 218
  • Health 44
Replace Amon Exavery with:
Amon Exavery Tanzania
Kaniz Gausia Australia
Saumya RamaRao United States
Florina Serbanescu United States
Onikepe Owolabi United States
Linnea Zimmerman United States
Yohannes Dibaba Ethiopia
Boniface A. Oye-Adeniran Nigeria
Mussie Alemayehu Ethiopia
Tamara Fetters United States
John Stanback relative to Amon Exavery Tanzania Amon Exavery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Amon Exavery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Stanback

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stanback's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stanback with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stanback more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stanback

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stanback. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stanback. The network helps show where John Stanback may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Stanback, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Stanback Line = papers co-authored together John Stanback links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201076
2 200770
3 200963
4 200161
5 199258
6 201553
7 199251
8 199746
9 201240
10 201336
11 201433
12 200731
13 199828
14 200728
15 201227
16 200526
17 201117
18 201417
19 200816
20 201315

About John Stanback

John Stanback is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Health, having authored 53 papers that have together received 977 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (34 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (20 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (9 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (523 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (355 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (72 citations), General Health Professions (218 citations) and Health (44 citations). John Stanback has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Janowitz, Jeff Spieler, Iqbal Shah, Shawn Malarcher, David A. Grimes, Olav Meirik, Karen Hardee, Willard Cates, M. Steiner and Julie Solo. Their work appears in journals such as Contraception, Studies in Family Planning, Global Health Science and Practice, International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact