John Stanback

51 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers

John Stanback
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 509
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 346
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 70
  • General Health Professions 211
  • Health 44
Replace Amon Exavery with:
Amon Exavery Tanzania
Saumya RamaRao United States
William Winfrey United States
Yohannes Dibaba Ethiopia
Florina Serbanescu United States
Linnea Zimmerman United States
Mussie Alemayehu Ethiopia
Lucinda Manda‐Taylor Malawi
Boniface A. Oye-Adeniran Nigeria
Liberata Campos Coimbra Brazil
John Stanback relative to Amon Exavery Tanzania Amon Exavery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Amon Exavery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Stanback

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stanback's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stanback with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stanback more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stanback

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stanback. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stanback. The network helps show where John Stanback may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Stanback, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Stanback Line = papers co-authored together John Stanback links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201073
2 200768
3 200963
4 200161
5 199258
6 201552
7 199251
8 199746
9 201237
10 201336
11 201433
12 200731
13 200728
14 201227
15 199827
16 200526
17 201417
18 201116
19 201315
20 200814

About John Stanback

John Stanback is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Health, having authored 52 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (33 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (19 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (509 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (346 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (70 citations), General Health Professions (211 citations) and Health (44 citations). John Stanback has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Janowitz, Jeff Spieler, Iqbal Shah, Shawn Malarcher, David A. Grimes, Karen Hardee, Willard Cates, Olav Meirik, M. Steiner and Laneta J. Dorflinger. Their work appears in journals such as Contraception, Global Health Science and Practice, Studies in Family Planning, International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact