Emily Keyes
Impact in
-
- Global Maternal and Child Health
- Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Papers in
-
- Global Maternal and Child Health 8
-
- COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction 2
- Co-authors
- Patricia Bailey (8 shared papers)Luwei Pearson (2 shared papers)Lynn P. Freedman (2 shared papers)Caleb Parker (4 shared papers)Muna Abdullah (2 shared papers)Kavita Singh (3 shared papers)Allisyn C. Moran (2 shared papers)Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (4 papers)BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (3 papers)BMC Health Services Research (2 papers)Reproductive Health (1 paper)Global Health Science and Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEthiopiaMozambique
In The Last Decade
Emily Keyes
17 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 239
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 40
- Finance 25
- Nutrition and Dietetics 28
- General Health Professions 39
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Keyes
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Keyes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Keyes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Keyes. The network helps show where Emily Keyes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 |
About Emily Keyes
Emily Keyes is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Business and International Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Research, having authored 17 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (1 paper), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (1 paper), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (1 paper) and Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (239 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (40 citations), Finance (25 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (28 citations) and General Health Professions (39 citations). Emily Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ethiopia and Mozambique. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Bailey, Luwei Pearson, Lynn P. Freedman, Caleb Parker, Muna Abdullah, Kavita Singh, Allisyn C. Moran, Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh, Michel Brun and Edwin Libamba. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, BMC Health Services Research, Reproductive Health and Global Health Science and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.