John Sender

43 papers receiving 702 citations

Peers

John Sender
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Business and International Management 73
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 176
  • Public Administration 63
  • Soil Science 169
  • Development 63
Replace Dipak Mazumdar with:
Dipak Mazumdar United States
Justin Sandefur United States
Tessa Bold Sweden
Ira N. Gang United States
Robert L. Ayres United States
Sara Horrell United Kingdom
Jìmí O. Adésínà South Africa
Vivi Alatas United States
Peter P. Houtzager United Kingdom
Isis Gaddis United States
John Sender relative to Dipak Mazumdar United States Dipak Mazumdar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Dipak Mazumdar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Sender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Sender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Sender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sender. The network helps show where John Sender may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Sender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Sender Line = papers co-authored together John Sender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Restructuring the Labour Market: The South African Challenge
1996127
2 2003106
3 199973
4
Restructuring the Labour Market: the South African challenge. An ILO Country Review
199671
5 200849
6 200849
7 199443
8 200940
9 201637
10 200635
11 200230
12 200223
13 200622
14 198522
15 201422
16 201421
17 197921
18 201516
19 199412
20 201512

About John Sender

John Sender is a scholar working on Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Business and International Management, having authored 47 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (12 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (7 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (6 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (5 papers), South African History and Culture (4 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers) and Legal Issues in South Africa (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (73 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (176 citations), Public Administration (63 citations), Soil Science (169 citations) and Development (63 citations). John Sender has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Johnston, Carlos Oya, John Weeks, Guy Standing, Christopher Cramer, Jonathan Pincus, Xerxes Tata, Howard Baer, Peter Nolan and John B. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Southern African Studies, Journal of Agrarian Change, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, Feminist Economics and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact