John Sender

53 papers receiving 831 citations

Peers

John Sender
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Business and International Management 84
  • Development 105
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 198
  • Public Administration 71
  • Soil Science 180
Replace Justin Sandefur with:
Justin Sandefur United States
Tessa Bold Sweden
Ira N. Gang United States
Sanjay G. Reddy United States
Robert L. Ayres United States
Vivi Alatas Indonesia
Isis Gaddis United States
V. K. R. V. Rao United States
Flore Gubert France
Jan Pierskalla United States
John Sender relative to Justin Sandefur United States Justin Sandefur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Justin Sandefur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Sender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Sender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Sender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sender. The network helps show where John Sender may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Sender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Sender Line = papers co-authored together John Sender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Restructuring the Labour Market: The South African Challenge
1996140
2 2003111
3 199982
4
Restructuring the Labour Market: the South African challenge. An ILO Country Review
199675
5 198771
6 200853
7 200852
8 201647
9 199443
10 200940
11 200639
12 200233
13 198527
14 200625
15 201425
16 200224
17 197923
18 201423
19 201519
20 201018

About John Sender

John Sender is a scholar working on Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Business and International Management, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (13 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (7 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (6 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (5 papers), African history and culture studies (4 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (4 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers) and South African History and Culture (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (84 citations), Development (105 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (198 citations), Public Administration (71 citations) and Soil Science (180 citations). John Sender has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Johnston, Carlos Oya, John Weeks, Guy Standing, Christopher Cramer, SHEILA M. SMITH, Jonathan Pincus, Xerxes Tata, Howard Baer and Peter Nolan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agrarian Change, Journal of Southern African Studies, Capital & Class, Journal of Contemporary African Studies and African Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact