John Sedgwick

879 citations
42 papers · 412 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Sedgwick

39 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

John Sedgwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 210
  • Urban Studies 81
  • Economics and Econometrics 289
  • History 50
  • Marketing 38
Replace Elizabeth Currid with:
Elizabeth Currid United States
Julia F. Lowell United States
Kim Oosterlinck Belgium
Deb Verhoeven Australia
Erwin Dekker Netherlands
Walter Santagata Italy
Adrian C. Darnell United Kingdom
María José del Barrio‐Tellado Spain
Eva Vicente Hernández Spain
Jonathan Remy Nash United States
John Sedgwick relative to Elizabeth Currid United States Elizabeth Currid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Elizabeth Currid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Sedgwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Sedgwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sedgwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sedgwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Sedgwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sedgwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sedgwick. The network helps show where John Sedgwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Sedgwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Sedgwick Line = papers co-authored together John Sedgwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199840
2
Popular Filmgoing In 1930s Britain: A Choice of Pleasures
200039
3 201237
4 200529
5 200927
6 200227
7 200122
8 199921
9 200920
10 201318
11 201211
12 201210
13 201010
14 20149
15 20068
16 20188
17 20148
18
Cinema going in the United States in the mid-1930s: a study based on the Variety dataset
20127
19 19946
20 19946

About John Sedgwick

John Sedgwick is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 42 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (27 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (27 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (7 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (6 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (5 papers), Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues (4 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (210 citations), Urban Studies (81 citations), Economics and Econometrics (289 citations), History (50 citations) and Marketing (38 citations). John Sedgwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mongolia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael Pokorny, Vlasios Voudouris, Dimitrios Stasinopoulos, Robert A. Rigby, Robert Gilchrist, Ian Jennings, John Curran, Emanuele Teti, Alan Collins and Ken’ichi Matsumoto. Their work appears in journals such as Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television, Journal of Cultural Economics, Business History, The Economic History Review and Enterprise & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact