John Roesler

20 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

John Roesler
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 226
  • Computational Mechanics 183
  • Atmospheric Science 74
  • Biomedical Engineering 174
  • Automotive Engineering 44
Replace Morio Hori with:
Morio Hori Japan
Donald J. Hautman United States
N. Slavinskaya Germany
Patrick Le Clercq Germany
Sandra Richter Germany
Leonardo Pellegrini Italy
A. Sogaro Italy
A. Goldaniga Italy
L. Maurice United States
Dhrubajyoti D. Das United States
John Roesler relative to Morio Hori Japan Morio Hori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Morio Hori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Roesler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Roesler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Roesler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Roesler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Roesler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Roesler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Roesler. The network helps show where John Roesler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Roesler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Roesler Line = papers co-authored together John Roesler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200679
2 200362
3 201745
4 199245
5 201140
6 202127
7 200126
8 199220
9 201419
10 201318
11 199314
12 199414
13 199814
14 200110
15 199610
16 19649
17 20006
18 19614
19 20191
20 20131

About John Roesler

John Roesler is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Atmospheric Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (10 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (9 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (7 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (4 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (3 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (2 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (2 papers) and Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (226 citations), Computational Mechanics (183 citations), Atmospheric Science (74 citations), Biomedical Engineering (174 citations) and Automotive Engineering (44 citations). John Roesler has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Frederick L. Dryer, Richard A. Yetter, Gladys Moréac, Philippe Dagaut, Michel Cathonnet, Jean-Louis Delfau, Charles S. McEnally, Lisa D. Pfefferle, C. Vovelle and M. Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Combustion Science and Technology, Combustion and Flame, Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, Analytical Chemistry and The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact