Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles

32.0k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles

1.4k papers receiving 30.6k citations

Peers

Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 3.9k
  • Ocean Engineering 9.0k
  • Analytical Chemistry 4.1k
  • Mechanics of Materials 7.9k
  • Environmental Engineering 4.2k
Replace Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science with:
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science United States
Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data United States
Energy Sources Türkiye
Energy Science & Engineering China
Advances in polymer science Germany
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering China
Applied Mechanics Reviews United States
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science United States
Environmental Chemistry Letters China
Metallurgical Transactions B United States
Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles relative to Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science United States Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles.

About Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles

The 1.4k papers published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles in the last decades have received a total of 32.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles usually cover Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (185 papers), Ocean Engineering (462 papers), Analytical Chemistry (139 papers), Mechanical Engineering (502 papers) and Environmental Engineering (182 papers) specifically the topics of Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (255 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (230 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (189 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (156 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (150 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (145 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (129 papers) and CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles are Sara Thomas, James G. Speight, V. Beaumont, F. Béhar, Henrique Luiz de Barros Penteado, A. Benkenida, Olivier Colin, B. Flaconneche, Anders Lyngfelt and Jean-François Argillier.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact