John Rieder
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
- Philosophy top 2%
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Papers in
-
- American and British Literature Analysis 2
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 2
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 2
-
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction 9
John Rieder
17 papers receiving 148 citations
John Rieder's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cultural Studies 120
- Philosophy 150
- Literature and Literary Theory 141
- Geography, Planning and Development 20
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 17
Countries citing papers authored by John Rieder
This map shows the geographic impact of John Rieder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Rieder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Rieder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Rieder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Rieder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Rieder. The network helps show where John Rieder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Rieder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 212 |
| 2 | Science Fiction and the Mass Cultural Genre System | 2017 | 36 |
| 3 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 6 | Multiculturalism and representation : selected essays | 1996 | 8 |
| 7 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 10 | Changing representations of minorities East and West : selected essays | 1996 | 4 |
| 11 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 17 | Science Fiction and Cultural Theory: A Reader ed. by Sherryl Vint (review) | 2018 | 1 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 1 |
About John Rieder
John Rieder is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (9 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers) and Asian American and Pacific Histories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (120 citations), Philosophy (150 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (141 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (20 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations). John Rieder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Larry E. Smith, Cristina Bacchilega and Robert Latham. Their work appears in journals such as Science Fiction Studies, Biography, Extrapolation, Studies in Romanticism and ELH.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.