Science Fiction Studies

383 papers and 543 indexed citations i.

About

The 383 papers published in Science Fiction Studies in the last decades have received a total of 543 indexed citations. Papers published in Science Fiction Studies usually cover Philosophy (137 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (108 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (79 papers) specifically the topics of Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (123 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (49 papers) and Digital Games and Media (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science Fiction Studies are Mark Bould, David A. Kirby, István Csicsery‐Rónay, Timothy S. Miller, Mingwei Song, Susan Napier, Simon Spiegel, Qian Jiang, Roger Luckhurst and Elana Gomel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Science Fiction Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science Fiction Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science Fiction Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Science Fiction Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science Fiction Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science Fiction Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science Fiction Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025