John R. Stringham

21 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

John R. Stringham
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 279
  • Biochemistry 82
  • Emergency Medicine 111
  • Internal Medicine 30
  • Hematology 62
Replace Geoffrey R. Nunns with:
Geoffrey R. Nunns United States
Michael Sawyer Canada
E. Shannon Cooper United States
Richard R. Clark United Kingdom
Ángel Herruzo-Avilés Spain
Ralf Karger Germany
Philip Boger United Kingdom
J. Umlas United States
Katherine D. Connolly United Kingdom
Susanna F. Fustolo‐Gunnink Netherlands
John R. Stringham relative to Geoffrey R. Nunns United States Geoffrey R. Nunns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.8×
Geoffrey R. Nunns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Stringham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Stringham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Stringham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Stringham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Stringham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Stringham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Stringham. The network helps show where John R. Stringham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John R. Stringham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John R. Stringham Line = papers co-authored together John R. Stringham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013164
2 201466
3 200553
4 200652
5 201447
6 201544
7 201427
8 201223
9 201821
10 201718
11 201917
12 201415
13 20189
14 20209
15 20207
16 20233
17 20142
18 20132
19 20122
20 20181

About John R. Stringham

John R. Stringham is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Hematology, Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Transplantation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (1 paper), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (1 paper), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (1 paper) and Blood transfusion and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (279 citations), Biochemistry (82 citations), Emergency Medicine (111 citations), Internal Medicine (30 citations) and Hematology (62 citations). John R. Stringham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ernest Eugene Moore, Anirban M. Banerjee, Theresa L. Chin, Michael P. Chapman, Christopher C. Silliman, Angela Sauaia, Arsen Ghasabyan, Jeffrey N. Harr, Christopher R. Ramos and Mesut Eren. Their work appears in journals such as Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care and Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact