John Poe
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Accounting top 10%
Papers in
-
- Advanced Causal Inference Techniques 2
-
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 1
- Co-authors
- Alyssa Bilinski (2 shared papers)Jonathan P. Roth (1 shared paper)Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna (1 shared paper)Rebecca Bromley‐Trujillo (2 shared papers)Raymond L. Calabrese (1 shared paper)J. S. Butler (1 shared paper)Richard W. Waterman (1 shared paper)Ouyang Yu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Review of Policy Research (1 paper)Statistics in Medicine (1 paper)Social Science Quarterly (1 paper)Journal of Public Policy (1 paper)Journal of Econometrics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Poe
6 papers receiving 1.0k citations
John Poe's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Economics and Econometrics 373
- Accounting 71
- Finance 58
- Political Science and International Relations 144
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 46
Countries citing papers authored by John Poe
This map shows the geographic impact of John Poe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Poe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Poe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Poe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Poe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Poe. The network helps show where John Poe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Poe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 837 |
| 2 | 2018 | 126 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 4 | Alienation: An Explanation of High Dropout Rates among African American and Latino Students. | 1991 | 37 |
| 5 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 3 |
About John Poe
John Poe is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Education and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (2 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (1 paper), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper), Climate Change Policy and Economics (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (373 citations), Accounting (71 citations), Finance (58 citations), Political Science and International Relations (144 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (46 citations). John Poe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alyssa Bilinski, Jonathan P. Roth, Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, Rebecca Bromley‐Trujillo, Raymond L. Calabrese, J. S. Butler, Richard W. Waterman, Ouyang Yu, Andrew M. Ryan and Ishani Ganguli. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Policy Research, Statistics in Medicine, Social Science Quarterly, Journal of Public Policy and Journal of Econometrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.