John Piggott

7.2k citations
169 papers · 5.8k · h-index 41

Impact in

Papers in

John Piggott

161 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers

John Piggott
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Food Science 3.3k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.2k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 1.4k
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 142
  • Biochemistry 475
Replace Duncan Hedderley with:
Duncan Hedderley New Zealand
Edgar Chambers United States
Flavia Gasperi Italy
Rosires Deliza Brazil
M.A.J.S. van Boekel Netherlands
Tormod Næs Norway
Philip G. Crandall United States
Morten Meilgaard United States
Saskia M. van Ruth Netherlands
B. Thomas Carr Australia
John Piggott relative to Duncan Hedderley New Zealand Duncan Hedderley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Duncan Hedderley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Piggott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Piggott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Piggott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Piggott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Piggott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Piggott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Piggott. The network helps show where John Piggott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Piggott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Piggott Line = papers co-authored together John Piggott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988351
2 2001331
3 2003248
4 2006219
5 1982217
6
Statistical procedures in food research
1986214
7
Sensory analysis of foods.
1988193
8 2001138
9 2000127
10 2007125
11
The Science and Technology of Whiskies
1989119
12 1998110
13 200684
14 199483
15 199777
16 201274
17 200174
18 199573
19 200064
20 199363

About John Piggott

John Piggott is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Plant Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 169 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (62 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (44 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (43 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (24 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (18 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (11 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (10 papers) and Food composition and properties (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (3.3k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (1.2k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.4k citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (142 citations) and Biochemistry (475 citations). John Piggott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Paterson, J.M. Conner, Andrew G. H. Lea, Frances Jack, Alan Paterson, Neville A. Stanton, A. Colin Cameron, Pravin K. Trivedi, Frank Milne and R. Lakshmanan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, International Journal of Food Science & Technology, Food Quality and Preference and Journal of Sensory Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact