Daniel R. Feenberg

487 citations
17 papers · 338 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel R. Feenberg

16 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Daniel R. Feenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Gender Studies 109
  • Economics and Econometrics 271
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 74
  • Accounting 96
  • Finance 27
Replace Bertrand Garbinti with:
Bertrand Garbinti France
Salvador Ortigueira United States
Michel Strawczynski Israel
Ondřej Schneider Czechia
Stefan Homburg Germany
Ángel Melguizo Spain
Willi Leibfritz France
Laurent Simula France
Walter H. Fisher Austria
Laura Feiveson United States
Daniel R. Feenberg relative to Bertrand Garbinti France Bertrand Garbinti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Bertrand Garbinti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Feenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Feenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Feenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Feenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Feenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Feenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Feenberg. The network helps show where Daniel R. Feenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Feenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Feenberg Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Feenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199380
2 200069
3 198950
4 198735
5 199527
6 200416
7 199512
8 199711
9 20038
10
The Tax Treatment of Married Couples and the 1981 Tax Law
19827
11 19897
12 19916
13
Is There A Regional Bias in Federal Tax Subsidy Rates for Giving
19883
14 19863
15 20113
16
Identification in Tax-Price Regression Models: The Case of Charitable Giving
19821
17 19950

About Daniel R. Feenberg

Daniel R. Feenberg is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Accounting, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (15 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (13 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (7 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (7 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (2 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (1 paper), Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (109 citations), Economics and Econometrics (271 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (74 citations), Accounting (96 citations) and Finance (27 citations). Daniel R. Feenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James M. Poterba, Harvey S. Rosen, David Gilroy, William M. Gentry, Martin Feldstein, Jonathan Skinner and Charles T. Clotfelter. Their work appears in journals such as Tax Policy and the Economy, National Tax Journal, American Economic Review, The Review of Economics and Statistics and Journal of Public Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact