Daniel R. Feenberg
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
- Taxation and Compliance Studies
Papers in
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 8
-
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 10
- Taxation and Compliance Studies 4
- Fiscal Policies and Political Economy 2
- Co-authors
- James M. Poterba (5 shared papers)Harvey S. Rosen (4 shared papers)William M. Gentry (1 shared paper)David Gilroy (1 shared paper)Martin S. Feldstein (1 shared paper)Jonathan Skinner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Tax Policy and the Economy (4 papers)National Tax Journal (3 papers)Journal of Public Economics (1 paper)The Review of Economics and Statistics (1 paper)American Economic Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel R. Feenberg
11 papers receiving 214 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Gender Studies 79
- Economics and Econometrics 209
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 59
- Accounting 67
- Political Science and International Relations 51
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Feenberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Feenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Feenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Feenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Feenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Feenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Feenberg. The network helps show where Daniel R. Feenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Feenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 32 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 3 |
About Daniel R. Feenberg
Daniel R. Feenberg is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 11 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (10 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (8 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (4 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (2 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (1 paper), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (1 paper) and Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (79 citations), Economics and Econometrics (209 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (59 citations), Accounting (67 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (51 citations). Daniel R. Feenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James M. Poterba, Harvey S. Rosen, William M. Gentry, David Gilroy, Martin S. Feldstein and Jonathan Skinner. Their work appears in journals such as Tax Policy and the Economy, National Tax Journal, Journal of Public Economics, The Review of Economics and Statistics and American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.