John Pease
Impact in
-
- Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice 1
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 1
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 1
-
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 1
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Edward O. Laumann (2 shared papers)William H. Form (1 shared paper)Robert W. Hodge (1 shared paper)Paul M. Siegel (1 shared paper)Richard A. Mathers (1 shared paper)Meyer Weinberg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sociological Forum (2 papers)Social Forces (2 papers)American Sociological Review (1 paper)Sociological Inquiry (1 paper)Teaching Sociology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Pease
9 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 247
- Gender Studies 36
- Health 24
- Political Science and International Relations 69
- Demography 30
Countries citing papers authored by John Pease
This map shows the geographic impact of John Pease's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pease more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Pease
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pease. The network helps show where John Pease may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Pease, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1971 | 180 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1970 | 48 | |
| 4 | 1967 | 24 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 9 | Use of the General Social Survey Data and Cross-Tabulation Programs in Teaching Data Analysis. | 1975 | 3 |
About John Pease
John Pease is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 9 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper), Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper), Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (247 citations), Gender Studies (36 citations), Health (24 citations), Political Science and International Relations (69 citations) and Demography (30 citations). John Pease has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward O. Laumann, William H. Form, Robert W. Hodge, Paul M. Siegel, Richard A. Mathers and Meyer Weinberg. Their work appears in journals such as Sociological Forum, Social Forces, American Sociological Review, Sociological Inquiry and Teaching Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.