John Paul Minda

3.6k citations
49 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

John Paul Minda

49 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

John Paul Minda
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 532
  • General Decision Sciences 76
  • Cultural Studies 312
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 671
Replace Moreno I. Coco with:
Moreno I. Coco United Kingdom
Robert Morrison United States
Donald Homa United States
Amy Perfors Australia
Chris Westbury Canada
Jennifer Culbertson United Kingdom
Michael J. Cortese United States
Riccardo Fusaroli Denmark
John C. Dunn Australia
Murray Singer Canada
John Paul Minda relative to Moreno I. Coco United Kingdom Moreno I. Coco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Moreno I. Coco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Paul Minda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Paul Minda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Paul Minda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Paul Minda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Paul Minda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Paul Minda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Paul Minda. The network helps show where John Paul Minda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Paul Minda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Paul Minda Line = papers co-authored together John Paul Minda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998319
2 2001184
3 2000151
4 2011138
5 2010110
6 2002109
7 200096
8 199782
9 200280
10 200478
11 200865
12 200260
13 202049
14 200146
15 201346
16 199846
17 201440
18 201136
19 200132
20 201130

About John Paul Minda

John Paul Minda is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cultural Studies, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (26 papers), Language and cultural evolution (7 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (532 citations), General Decision Sciences (76 citations), Cultural Studies (312 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (671 citations). John Paul Minda has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include J. David Smith, J. David Smith, Rahel Rabi, David J. Smith, Sarah Miles, David A. Washburn, Mark Goldszmidt, Julie J. Carswell, Amy S. Desroches and Barbara A. Church. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, PLoS ONE, Psychology and Aging, Frontiers in Psychology and Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact