John P. Maier

6.9k citations
256 papers · 5.8k · h-index 40

Impact in

Papers in

John P. Maier

253 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

John P. Maier
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Spectroscopy 3.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 4.8k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.0k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 874
  • Atmospheric Science 864
Replace Yoshihiro Osamura with:
Yoshihiro Osamura Japan
Peter Botschwina Germany
Yasuki Endo Japan
Peter D. Godfrey Australia
J. Demaison France
R. D. Suenram United States
Kentarou Kawaguchi Japan
F. J. Lovas United States
F. J. Lovas United States
Y. Ellinger France
John P. Maier relative to Yoshihiro Osamura Japan Yoshihiro Osamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Yoshihiro Osamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John P. Maier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John P. Maier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John P. Maier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John P. Maier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John P. Maier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John P. Maier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John P. Maier. The network helps show where John P. Maier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John P. Maier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John P. Maier Line = papers co-authored together John P. Maier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 256 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977279
2 1995131
3 2001121
4 1995111
5 1998106
6 198096
7 200188
8 199786
9 201379
10 199679
11 199478
12 197572
13 199571
14 200467
15 200067
16 199565
17 197664
18 199963
19 199958
20 199954

About John P. Maier

John P. Maier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atmospheric Science and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 256 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (223 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (102 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (60 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (54 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (42 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (36 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (33 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (3.1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (4.8k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.0k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (874 citations) and Atmospheric Science (864 citations). John P. Maier has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Jan Fulara, Otto Dopfer, Michael Allan, Patrick Freivogel, E. Heilbronner, Michel Grutter, Daniel Forney, Fritz Thommen, Else Kloster‐Jensen and Felix Güthe. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Chemical Physics Letters, Chemical Physics and Molecular Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact