Daniel Forney

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel Forney
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 526
  • Spectroscopy 405
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 804
  • Inorganic Chemistry 188
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 150
Replace Patrick Freivogel with:
Patrick Freivogel Switzerland
Patrick Chaquin France
Warren E. Thompson United States
Stefan Schmatz Germany
Alice M. Smith Germany
Jean‐Pierre François Belgium
A. Schriver France
Louise Schriver France
Michael J. Henchman United States
K.‐M. Marstokk Norway
Daniel Forney relative to Patrick Freivogel Switzerland Patrick Freivogel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Patrick Freivogel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Forney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Forney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Forney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Forney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Forney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Forney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Forney. The network helps show where Daniel Forney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Forney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Forney Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Forney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995135
2 199398
3 199285
4 199585
5 199682
6 199573
7 200370
8 199567
9 199362
10 199747
11 199342
12 199740
13 199439
14 199537
15 200036
16 198935
17 199632
18 199732
19 198730
20 199227

About Daniel Forney

Daniel Forney is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (27 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (19 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (13 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (10 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (6 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (2 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (526 citations), Spectroscopy (405 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (804 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (188 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (150 citations). Daniel Forney has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn E. Jacox, Patrick Freivogel, Warren E. Thompson, John P. Maier, Michel Grutter, Jan Fulara, John Paul Maier, Karl K. Irikura, Catherine L. Lugez and Martin Schäfer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, Chemical Physics Letters, Chemical Physics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact